Terrorism In Canada

[superman321]

for the simple reason of actually ascertaining whether they are innocent or guilty. Our court systems, in countries such as Canada and Aus, are based on the premice of innocent until proven guilty after all. At a time when enough blood is spillt all over the world, why would we partake in actions which add to this bloodshed, they may be innocent,t hey may be guilty, but you have to find out.

[Leighton]

Why have a trial, just kill em

Didn't you hear about the terror raids in England two weeks back?

Scary shit....

The police shot a man, and of course he and his brother was subsequently cleared of any wrong doing whatsoever.

Ooops.... LOL!
Could you imagine 250 police using their "intelligence" raiding your home and shooting you on 'suspician'?

Same thing with the Brazilian electrician killed during the actual London attacks.

That's why.

[Danallica]

And your point is?

[Fadingtoblack]

It's that same no-win situation for the Police.


Either they act on information they have, and get their arses kicked for making a mistake, or, they do nothing, and as a result an attack might occur, THEN they get their arses kicked ala the US government on not stopping September 11.


I really don't envy those guys in their job....

[Danallica]

True Dat

Ive always believed that Its better to be pro-active rather than reactive. The fact that a mistake was made by police in arresting the wrong people (although chances are they were involved anyways) in a pro-active attempt is far better than arresting people that are guilty of commiting a terrorist act, in a reactionary manner.

Sure, Americas response to the 11/9 attacks has been reactive and, if they had have been proactive, these attacks are likely never to have occured. But for now it appears as if these terrorists have once again awaken the sleeping giant that is America, lets see if the US can win its first war in like 60 years

[Leighton]

It must be sweet-as to be in a situation where there will always be someone to defend whtever you do or don't do though.

[Danallica]

It must suck being in a position where people will critisize what you do no matter what though

[Leighton]

Yeah, cause shooting innocents is so not worthy of calling people on.



It's called murder, Dan. I'm not for it. If I killed you, then said I thought there was an outside chance you were a terrorist, should I get away with it?

[Danallica]

In any event i gurantee you that the two guys they arrested are involved and will be involded in future attacks and terrorist plots

[Leighton]

LOL!

You're just too precious, Dan. You're a scared little thing, aren't you?

They let the two go because they fucked up. In the effort to appease folkes like you that there are people doing something to fight terrorism, they shot someone.

Kind of like Charles de Menezes:

Police shot and killed a Brazilian man, Jean Charles de Menezes, at Stockwell tube station shortly after 10:00 on 22 July. Officers had pursued de Menezes from a location under surveillance, believing him to be one of the men wanted for the attacks of the previous day. They apparently believed de Menezes, who was claimed to be wearing a heavy jacket – later shown to be an ordinary denim jacket – was a possible suicide bomber.

Police later confirmed he was not related to the bombing incidents and issued an apology, saying that "For somebody to lose their life in such circumstances is a tragedy and one that the Metropolitan Police Service regrets."(BBC News). Mr de Menezes was shot eight times, seven in the head at close range while pinned to the ground. He died at the scene

I bet he had something to do with it anyway.